Skip to main content

Seizure Prosecution

CDSCO enforcement actions are taken under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 and the Medical Devices Rules 2017. Appeals against CDSCO orders are made to the Central Licensing Authority or, ultimately, to the Courts.

Official source: D&C Act 1940, Sections 22–27B; MDR 2017, Chapter VIII

Seizure & Prosecution Overview

Seizure & Prosecution Overview

Legal grounds for seizure: CDSCO may seize medical devices under Section 21 of the D&C Act 1940 when:

  • Devices are adulterated, misbranded, or sub-standard
  • Manufacturing or storage conditions violate GMP requirements
  • Devices lack required approvals or licenses
  • Devices pose a safety or public health risk

Seizure process:

  1. Inspector documents non-compliance and issues seizure notice
  2. Seized devices are held pending investigation
  3. Manufacturer may request release upon demonstration of compliance
  4. If non-compliance confirmed, devices are destroyed or forfeited

Criminal prosecution: CDSCO may prosecute manufacturers, importers, or distributors under Sections 22–27B of the D&C Act for:

  • Manufacture or sale of adulterated/misbranded devices
  • Violation of GMP or licensing requirements
  • Failure to comply with enforcement orders

Penalties: Criminal sanctions include fines (up to ₹5 lakhs for first offense; ₹10 lakhs+ for subsequent offenses) and imprisonment (up to 3 years).

Official source: D&C Act 1940, Sections 21–27B; MDR 2017, Chapter VIII

Seizure & Prosecution Overview

CDSCO has authority to seize non-compliant devices under Section 21 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940. Seizure may be followed by prosecution under Sections 27–27B of the D&C Act 1940, which provides for:

  • Criminal penalties including fines and imprisonment
  • Confiscation of devices and manufacturing equipment
  • Disqualification of manufacturers or importers

Prosecution is typically pursued for serious violations such as:

  • Manufacturing without valid license
  • Distributing counterfeit or substandard devices
  • Misrepresentation of device specifications or clinical data
  • Violation of recall orders