Skip to main content

GSPR Checklist Approach

Overview

A GSPR compliance matrix maps every applicable MedDO Annex I requirement to the evidence of compliance. It is a mandatory element of technical documentation and will be reviewed by the notified body and/or Swissmedic.

Compliance Matrix Columns

ColumnContent
GSPR ReferenceSpecific Annex I section (e.g. "Chapter II, § 10.3")
Requirement SummaryPlain-English description of the requirement
ApplicabilityApplicable / Not Applicable + justification
Method of ComplianceStandard, common specification, or other technical solution
Standard / Document ReferenceSpecific standard or test report
Evidence LocationWhere in the technical file the evidence can be found
StatusCompliant / Non-compliant / In progress

Handling Non-Applicable Requirements

Every non-applicable GSPR requirement must include a specific, documented justification based on the device's design, materials, manufacturing process, and intended use. Generic justifications such as "not applicable to this type of device" are insufficient and will be questioned by the NB during conformity assessment. The justification should explain why the requirement logically does not apply to this specific device (e.g., "no biological materials used, therefore GSPR Chapter VI (biological hazards) not applicable").

Gap Analysis Before NB Submission

Before submitting to an NB, conduct a thorough gap analysis to identify: GSPRs with incomplete or missing testing; outdated or superseded standard references; requirements addressed only by internal documents without independent external validation (such as standards compliance or third-party testing); device-specific GSPR interpretations that lack documented justification; missing evidence of post-market surveillance planning for identified GSPR-related risks.

Design-Based Compliance (Non-Standard Approaches) ​ If a GSPR requirement is addressed through proprietary design, material selection, or manufacturing process rather than a published standard, the compliance matrix must include: detailed technical description of the design feature or process; engineering justification or risk analysis explaining why the approach meets the GSPR requirement; results of any validation testing, simulation, or analysis supporting the design approach; reference to any internal design specifications or process documentation; evidence that the approach has been reviewed and approved by the design review or risk management process. Design-based compliance requires stronger technical evidence and may receive closer scrutiny from the NB.

Official Sources

Disclaimer

AI-assisted content for navigation only. Always verify against official Swissmedic and Fedlex sources. Not legal or regulatory advice.